Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
Skin Res Technol ; 29(4): e13314, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2293476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused changes in the medical practice. However, it is unclear whether the patients receiving phototherapy for their dermatoses have been affected. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on phototherapy, focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge. METHODS: The study encompassed the time 5 months prior to and after the surge of the COVID-19 pandemic (from May to July, 2021), resulting in the temporary closure of our phototherapeutic unit. RESULTS: Nine hundred eighty-one patients received phototherapy during this period. Vitiligo, psoriasis (Ps), and atopic dermatitis (AD) represented the groups with the highest patient numbers. For vitiligo, Ps and AD, 39.6%, 41.9%, and 28.4% of the patients resumed phototherapy after the pandemic-related shutdown (PRS). No significant difference was noted in age, gender, and number of weekly sessions between those who resumed or stopped phototherapy after PRS among three groups. Patients who resumed phototherapy after PRS tended to receive more weekly sessions of phototherapy than those who initiated after PRS. Additionally, patients who resumed phototherapy showed no significant difference in the number of weekly sessions before and after PRS. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients undergoing phototherapy. Although the patient number remained similar before and after PRS, a significant portion of patients discontinued phototherapy after PRS. New strategies and continued education are needed to improve patient management in times of pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Atopic , Psoriasis , Ultraviolet Therapy , Vitiligo , Humans , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods , Taiwan/epidemiology , Pandemics , COVID-19/etiology , Phototherapy , Psoriasis/therapy
2.
Biomolecules ; 12(12)2022 12 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2199740

ABSTRACT

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease in which the overproduction of reactive oxygen species plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and persistence of inflammatory lesions. Phototherapy represents one of the most used therapeutic options, with benefits in the clinical picture. Studies have demonstrated the immunomodulatory effect of phototherapy and its role in reducing molecule hallmarks of oxidative stress. In this review, we report the data present in literature dealing with the main signaling molecular pathways involved in oxidative stress after phototherapy to target atopic dermatitis-affected cells. Since oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis and its flare-up, new research lines could be opened to study new drugs that act on this mechanism, perhaps in concert with phototherapy.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Ultraviolet Therapy , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/pathology , Phototherapy , Skin/pathology , Chronic Disease , Oxidative Stress
3.
Exp Dermatol ; 31(7): 1109-1115, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1868642

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 morbidity and mortality are driven by poor immune regulation. Narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy is standard of care in a number of immune-dysregulated diseases. To assess the efficacy of NB-UVB phototherapy for improving COVID-19 outcomes in high-risk, hospitalized, we developed the Adaptive Photo-Protection Trial. This is a multi-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The pilot phase results are reported here. Consecutive patients admitted with a positive COVID-19 PCR were screened for eligibility. Enrolled subjects were computer randomized 1:1 to NB-UVB or placebo phototherapy. Subjects were treated daily with escalating doses on 27% of their body surface area for up to 8 consecutive days. Primary outcomes were safety and efficacy, defined as persistent or painful erythema and 28-day mortality. Comparisons were made via non-parametric exact tests. Patients in treatment (n = 15) and placebo (n = 15) arms had similar demographics. No adverse events occurred. Twenty eight-day mortality was 13.3% in treatment vs. 33.3% in placebo arms (p = 0.39). NB-UVB phototherapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients was safe. Decreased mortality was observed in treated patients but this was statistically non-significant. Given its low-cost, scalability, and adjunctive nature, NB-UVB has the potential to improve COVID-19 outcomes. Continuation of this trial is warranted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ultraviolet Therapy , COVID-19/radiotherapy , Humans , Phototherapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Photochem Photobiol B ; 226: 112357, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1510060

ABSTRACT

Mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) protein mediates innate antiviral responses, including responses to certain coronaviruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). We have previously shown that ultraviolet-A (UVA) therapy can prevent virus-induced cell death in human ciliated tracheal epithelial cells (HTEpC) infected with coronavirus-229E (CoV-229E), and results in increased intracellular levels of MAVS. In this study, we explored the mechanisms by which UVA light can activate MAVS, and whether local UVA light application can activate MAVS at locations distant from the light source (e.g. via cell-to-cell communication). MAVS levels were compared in HTEpC exposed to 2 mW/cm2 narrow band (NB)-UVA for 20 min and in unexposed controls at 30-40% and at 100% confluency, and in unexposed HTEpC treated with supernatants or lysates from UVA-exposed cells or from unexposed controls. MAVS was also assessed in different sections of confluent monolayer plates where only one section was exposed to NB-UVA. Our results showed that UVA increases the expression of MAVS protein. Further, cells in a confluent monolayer exposed to UVA conferred an elevation in MAVS in cells adjacent to the exposed section, and also in cells in the most distant sections which were not exposed to UVA. In this study, human ciliated tracheal epithelial cells exposed to UVA demonstrate increased MAVS protein, and also appear to transmit this influence to confluent cells not exposed to UVA, likely via cell-cell signaling.


Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Rays , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/radiotherapy , COVID-19/virology , Cell Communication/immunology , Cell Communication/radiation effects , Cells, Cultured , Epithelial Cells/immunology , Epithelial Cells/radiation effects , Host Microbial Interactions/immunology , Host Microbial Interactions/radiation effects , Humans , Immunity, Innate/radiation effects , Photobiology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Signal Transduction/immunology , Signal Transduction/radiation effects , Trachea/cytology , Ultraviolet Therapy
5.
Clin Dermatol ; 39(3): 446-450, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1491856

ABSTRACT

Ultraviolet (UV) therapy is an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic method for various dermatologic conditions due to its antiproliferative and immunosuppressive effects. Contemporary phototherapy includes broadband UVB, narrowband UVB, UVA1, PUVA, and excimer laser therapy. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has resulted in the closure of many patient care facilities, including phototherapy units worldwide. Home phototherapy, thalassotherapy, and other UV therapy modalities are an alternative for many patients with chronic dermatoses. We highlighted possible interactions of UV therapy effects and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, and focused on organization and measures against transmission of infections in phototherapy units. Dermatology departments have reopened their units, assessing the risks and benefits for patients, optimizing safety regulations, and adhering to the rules for disinfection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ultraviolet Therapy , Humans , Pandemics , Phototherapy , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Vox Sang ; 116(6): 673-681, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1319364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: During the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in plasma and platelet products from asymptomatic blood donors, raising concerns about potential risk of transfusion transmission, also in the context of the current therapeutic approach utilizing plasma from convalescent donors. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of amotosalen/UVA light treatment to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 in human plasma to reduce the risk of potential transmission through blood transfusion. METHODS: Pools of three whole-blood-derived human plasma units (630-650 ml) were inoculated with a clinical SARS-CoV-2 isolate. Spiked units were treated with amotosalen/UVA light (INTERCEPT Blood System™) to inactivate SARS-CoV-2. Infectious titres and genomic viral load were assessed by plaque assay and real-time quantitative PCR. Inactivated samples were subject to three successive passages on permissive tissue culture to exclude the presence of replication-competent viral particles. RESULTS: Inactivation of infectious viral particles in spiked plasma units below the limit of detection was achieved by amotosalen/UVA light treatment with a mean log reduction of >3·32 ± 0·2. Passaging of inactivated samples on permissive tissue showed no viral replication even after 9 days of incubation and three passages, confirming complete inactivation. The treatment also inhibited NAT detection by nucleic acid modification with a mean log reduction of 2·92 ± 0·87 PFU genomic equivalents. CONCLUSION: Amotosalen/UVA light treatment of SARS-CoV-2 spiked human plasma units efficiently and completely inactivated >3·32 ± 0·2 log of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, showing that such treatment could minimize the risk of transfusion-related SARS-CoV-2 transmission.


Subject(s)
Furocoumarins/pharmacology , Plasma/virology , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , SARS-CoV-2/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Therapy , Virus Inactivation , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Humans , Transfusion Reaction/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
7.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 60(5): 103200, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1284583

ABSTRACT

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by well-demarcated erythematous plaques with a silver scale. Although many new and emerging therapeutic agents are often sufficient to control the disease, there is still a need for alternative treatment options in challenging cases. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been applied to many T-cell-mediated diseases to restore immune homeostasis and treat psoriasis effectively. In this paper, we present a psoriasis patient who did not respond to methotrexate, narrowband ultraviolet B, or acitretin. Because of a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the patient had contraindications for cyclosporine, fumaric acid esters, and biologics but achieved remission with a total of 12 sessions of ECP in two and a half months. Although exacerbation was recorded after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease infection at the end of the first month, scores from the psoriasis area severity index (PASI) and dermatological life quality index (DLQI) were regressed significantly within two and a half months. ECP seems to provide an effective and rapid response for psoriasis and should be considered for psoriasis patients who fail to respond or have contraindications to existing treatments.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/complications , Pandemics , Photopheresis , Psoriasis/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Acitretin/therapeutic use , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/etiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Contraindications, Drug , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Nails/pathology , Psoriasis/complications , Psoriasis/pathology , Psoriasis/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Ultraviolet Therapy
8.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251872, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1234592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic accelerates, the supply of personal protective equipment remains under strain. To combat shortages, re-use of surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators has been recommended. Prior decontamination is paramount to the re-use of these typically single-use only items and, without compromising their integrity, must guarantee inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other contaminating pathogens. AIM: We provide information on the effect of time-dependent passive decontamination (infectivity loss over time during room temperature storage in a breathable bag) and evaluate inactivation of a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate and a non-enveloped model virus as well as mask and respirator integrity following active multiple-cycle vaporised hydrogen peroxide (VHP), ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), and dry heat (DH) decontamination. METHODS: Masks and respirators, inoculated with infectious porcine respiratory coronavirus or murine norovirus, were submitted to passive decontamination or single or multiple active decontamination cycles; viruses were recovered from sample materials and viral titres were measured via TCID50 assay. In parallel, filtration efficiency tests and breathability tests were performed according to EN standard 14683 and NIOSH regulations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Infectious porcine respiratory coronavirus and murine norovirus remained detectable on masks and respirators up to five and seven days of passive decontamination. Single and multiple cycles of VHP-, UVGI-, and DH were shown to not adversely affect bacterial filtration efficiency of masks. Single- and multiple UVGI did not adversely affect respirator filtration efficiency, while VHP and DH induced a decrease in filtration efficiency after one or three decontamination cycles. Multiple cycles of VHP-, UVGI-, and DH slightly decreased airflow resistance of masks but did not adversely affect respirator breathability. VHP and UVGI efficiently inactivated both viruses after five, DH after three, decontamination cycles, permitting demonstration of a loss of infectivity by more than three orders of magnitude. This multi-disciplinal approach provides important information on how often a given PPE item may be safely reused.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/metabolism , Decontamination/methods , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , Norovirus/drug effects , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Equipment Reuse , Hot Temperature , Humans , Masks/microbiology , Norovirus/isolation & purification , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment/microbiology , Respiratory Protective Devices/microbiology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Ultraviolet Rays , Ultraviolet Therapy , Ventilators, Mechanical/microbiology , Volatilization
9.
Nutrients ; 13(5)2021 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1217109

ABSTRACT

Vitamin D, sunshine and UVB phototherapy were first reported in the early 1900s to control psoriasis, cure rickets and cure tuberculosis (TB). Vitamin D also controlled asthma and rheumatoid arthritis with intakes ranging from 60,000 to 600,000 International Units (IU)/day. In the 1980s, interest in treating psoriasis with vitamin D rekindled. Since 1985 four different oral forms of vitamin D (D2, D3, 1-hydroxyvitaminD3 (1(OH)D3) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitaminD3 (calcitriol)) and several topical formulations have been reported safe and effective treatments for psoriasis-as has UVB phototherapy and sunshine. In this review we show that many pre-treatment serum 25(OH)D concentrations fall within the current range of normal, while many post-treatment concentrations fall outside the upper limit of this normal (100 ng/mL). Yet, psoriasis patients showed significant clinical improvement without complications using these treatments. Current estimates of vitamin D sufficiency appear to underestimate serum 25(OH)D concentrations required for optimal health in psoriasis patients, while concentrations associated with adverse events appear to be much higher than current estimates of safe serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Based on these observations, the therapeutic index for vitamin D needs to be reexamined in the treatment of psoriasis and other diseases strongly linked to vitamin D deficiency, including COVID-19 infections, which may also improve safely with sufficient vitamin D intake or UVB exposure.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psoriasis , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Sunlight , Ultraviolet Therapy , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Psoriasis/blood , Psoriasis/therapy , Vitamin D/blood , Vitamin D/therapeutic use
10.
Ital J Dermatol Venerol ; 156(3): 366-373, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1207967

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has become pandemic on March 11th, 2020. COVID-19 has a range of symptoms that includes fever, fatigue, dry cough, aches, and labored breathing to acute respiratory distress and possibly death. Health systems and hospitals have been completely rearranged since March 2020 in order to limit the high rate of virus spreading. Hence, a great debate on deferrable visits and treatments including phototherapy for skin diseases is developing. In particular, as regards phototherapy very few data are currently available regarding the chance to continue it, even if it may be a useful resource for treating numerous dermatological patients. However, phototherapy has an immunosuppressive action possibly facilitating virus infection. In the context of COVID-19 infection risk it is important to pointed out whether sunlight, phototherapy and in particular ultraviolet radiation (UV-R) constitute or not a risk for patients. In this review we aimed to focus on the relationship between UV-R, sunlight, phototherapy, and viral infections particularly focusing on COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/radiation effects , Sunlight , Ultraviolet Rays , Vitamin D/physiology , Adaptive Immunity/radiation effects , Animals , Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides/biosynthesis , Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides/physiology , Cytokines/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Disease Susceptibility , Humans , Immunity, Innate/radiation effects , Immunosuppression Therapy , Interleukin-6/blood , Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern Molecules , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Skin Diseases/radiotherapy , Sunlight/adverse effects , Toll-Like Receptors/physiology , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Ultraviolet Therapy/adverse effects , Viruses/radiation effects , Vitamin D/biosynthesis , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Cathelicidins
11.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 5070, 2021 03 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1117656

ABSTRACT

Inactivation technology for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is certainly a critical measure to mitigate the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A deep ultraviolet light-emitting diode (DUV-LED) would be a promising candidate to inactivate SARS-CoV-2, based on the well-known antiviral effects of DUV on microorganisms and viruses. However, due to variations in the inactivation effects across different viruses, quantitative evaluations of the inactivation profile of SARS-CoV-2 by DUV-LED irradiation need to be performed. In the present study, we quantify the irradiation dose of DUV-LED necessary to inactivate SARS-CoV-2. For this purpose, we determined the culture media suitable for the irradiation of SARS-CoV-2 and optimized the irradiation apparatus using commercially available DUV-LEDs that operate at a center wavelength of 265, 280, or 300 nm. Under these conditions, we successfully analyzed the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and the irradiation dose of the DUV-LEDs at each wavelength without irrelevant biological effects. In conclusion, total doses of 1.8 mJ/cm2 for 265 nm, 3.0 mJ/cm2 for 280 nm, and 23 mJ/cm2 for 300 nm are required to inactivate 99.9% of SARS-CoV-2. Our results provide quantitative antiviral effects of DUV irradiation on SARS-CoV-2, serving as basic knowledge of inactivation technologies against SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
SARS-CoV-2/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods , Virus Inactivation/radiation effects , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Ultraviolet Rays , Virus Diseases/prevention & control
12.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(11): 1101-1108, 2020 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-941793

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical and economic comparisons of therapies for plaque psoriasis are regularly updated following each new devel- opment in the field. With the recent availability of a novel accessory (Multi Micro DoseTM [MMD®] tip) for the 308nm excimer laser (XTRAC®, Strata Skin Sciences, Horsham, PA), which can determine and deliver an optimal therapeutic dose (OTDTM) of ultraviolet-B light in an improved protocol, the need for comparative health-economic assessment recurs. To this end, a comprehensive evaluation of treatment-related costs was undertaken from the payer perspective. Results show that outcomes are influenced by many factors; most importantly, the severity and extent of disease, treatment selection, and patient preference, as well as compliance, adherence, and persistence with care. Among study comparators, the 308nm excimer laser – XTRAC – with its latest MMD enhancement, is safe and delivers incremental clinical benefits with the potential for significant cost savings. These benefits are particularly relevant today in the context of SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVid-19 pandemic. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(11):1101-1108. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5510.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Psoriasis/therapy , COVID-19 , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Lasers, Excimer/therapeutic use , Patient Compliance , Patient Preference , Psoriasis/economics , Psoriasis/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Ultraviolet Therapy/economics , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods
13.
15.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 31: 101943, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-693299

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To review the effect of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) as a disinfection method for filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) to facilitate reuse during COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Systematic review of the research concerning UVGI for FFRs disinfection to facilitate reuse (also termed limited reuse) during respiratory infectious diseases where aerosol transmission is considered possible. RESULTS: UVGI is one possible method for respiratory disinfection to facilitate the reuse of dwindling supplies. Appropriate dose UVGI exposition could provide enough energy to effectively decontaminate respiratory viral agents and maintain respirator's integrity for reuse. There was not currently sufficient research evidence on the effect of UVGI to inactivate coronaviruses SARS-CoV-2, and the practical application of UVGI is still unclear. . CONCLUSION: Appropriate dose UVGI exposition could provide enough energy to effectively decontaminate respiratory viral agents and maintain respirator's integrity for reuse. Further evidence concerning UVGI as a decontamination technique specifically for SARS-CoV-2 isneeded.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Decontamination/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Photochemotherapy/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods , Ventilators, Mechanical/virology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Equipment Reuse/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology
16.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 19(9): 2162-2164, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-648610

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 virus causes coronavirus disease. AIMS: It is a highly contagious viral infection. PATIENTS/METHODS/RESULTS/CONCLUSION: In this article, we will discuss the potential phototherapy problems and also alternative options for dermatologists, ultraviolet treatment against COVID-19 virus, and vitamin D-associated problems in these coronavirus days.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2/radiation effects , Skin Diseases/therapy , Ultraviolet Rays , Ultraviolet Therapy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Disinfection/methods , Humans , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Vitamin D/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/therapy
17.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 38(7): 395-397, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-613725

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the hypothesis that light could reduce the lethality of COVID-19. Methods: Most models for projections of the spread and lethality of COVID-19 take into account the ambient temperature, neglecting light. Recent advances in understanding the mechanism of action of COVID-19 have shown that it causes a systemic infection that significantly affects the hematopoietic system and hemostasis, factors extremely dependent of light, mainly in the region of visible and infrared radiation. Results: In the COVID-19 patients hemoglobin is decreasing and protoporphyrin is increasing, generating an extremely harmful accumulation of iron ions in the bloodstream, which are able to induce an intense inflammatory process in the body with a consequent increase in C-reactive protein and albumin. Observing the unsaturation characteristics of the cyclic porphyrin ring allows it to absorb and emit radiation mainly in the visible region. This characteristic can represent an important differential to change this process in the event of an imbalance in this system, through the photobiomodulation to increase the production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) using red and near-infrared radiation (R-NIR) and vitamin D using ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation. These two compounds have the primary role of activating the defense mechanisms of the immune system, enabling greater resistance of the individual against the attack by the virus. According to the theory of electron excitation in photosensitive molecules, similar to hemoglobin heme, after the photon absorption there would be an increase in the stability of the iron ion bond with the center of the pyrrole ring, preventing the losses of heme function oxygen transport (HbO2). The light is also absorbed by cytochrome c oxidase in the R-NIR region, with a consequent increase in electron transport, regulating enzyme activity and resulting in a significant increase of oxygen rate consumption by mitochondria, increasing ATP production. Conclusions: The most favorable range of optical radiation to operate in this system is between R-NIR region, in which cytochrome c oxidase and porphyrin present absorption peaks centered at 640 nm and HbO2 with absorption peak centered at 900 nm. Based on the mechanisms described earlier, our hypothesis is that light could reduce the lethality of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/radiotherapy , Ultraviolet Therapy , COVID-19 , Humans , Infrared Rays/therapeutic use , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Ultraviolet Rays
19.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(2): 703-704, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-92098
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL